Home Home Home Inbox Home Search

View Abstract

Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis: Presentation, Clinical Manifestations and Current Therapeutic Approaches

Description

.abstract img { width:300px !important; height:auto; display:block; text-align:center; margin-top:10px } .abstract { overflow-x:scroll } .abstract table { width:100%; display:block; border:hidden; border-collapse: collapse; margin-top:10px } .abstract td, th { border-top: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 4px 8px; } .abstract tbody tr:nth-child(even) td { background-color: #efefef; } .abstract a { overflow-wrap: break-word; word-wrap: break-word; }
A3117 - Autoimmune Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis: Presentation, Clinical Manifestations and Current Therapeutic Approaches
Author Block: B. C. Carey1, C. McCarthy1, M. Nowell-Bostic1, M. Rieman-Klingler1, C. Chalk1, A. Toth1, H. Lee2, M. Brelsford2, T. S. Wang3, J. Krischer2, B. C. Trapnell1; 1Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 2University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States, 3UCLA Dept of Pulm / Crit Care, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Rationale: Autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP) is a rare disorder of surfactant accumulation resulting in hypoxemic respiratory failure. It is caused by antibody-mediated disruption of granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signalling and accounts for 85-90% of all PAP patients and anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies are 100% sensitive and specific for diagnosis. While there is no FDA-approved therapy, a variety of therapeutic approaches, including several off-label pharmacotherapies are currently used. The aim of this study was to determine the presentation and treatments presently employed in aPAP patients.
Methods: The National PAP Registry includes patients with all types of PAP syndrome. Data from patients with confirmed aPAP who had completed a detailed questionnaire were included to define the clinical features and current treatment patterns.
Results: Among National PAP Registry participants, aPAP was the PAP-causing disease in 88%, and 35 aPAP patients for whom complete data were available were studied further. The mean age of aPAP patients was 44.03+/-1.5 years and 51.4% of patients had a history of smoking. The median time to diagnosis of aPAP from initial symptoms was 1.5yrs (IQR 1.5-2.25yrs, range 0.5-13.5yrs) and presenting symptoms included dyspnea (97%), fatigue (85.7%), persistent cough (68%), sputum production (62.8%) and chest tightness (60%). The median shortness of breath questionnaire scores (SOBQ:range=0-120) was 36.5 (IQR 17-72.5, range 0-95) at registration. Less common symptoms/signs included peripheral cyanosis (20%), hemoptysis (14.3%) and fever (14.3%). In the period just prior to diagnosis of PAP 28.5% of patients had been treated for a presumed pneumonia which failed to improve with antibiotic therapy. Of note, 5.7% of aPAP patients had a history of opportunistic infections of the central nervous system and in 2.8%, this was noted at initial presentation. Whole lung lavage (WLL) had been performed at least once in 77% of patients (n=27/35), the mean time between WLLs was 10.2 months (±5.5 months). There was high variation in treatment frequency (coefficient of variation 54.55%) across patients; 1 WLL (26%), 2-5 WLL (55%) and >5 WLL (18%). Other experimental therapies included GM-CSF therapy (28.5%), rituximab (17.1%), corticosteroids (8.6%) and mycophenolate mofetil (2.8%).
Conclusion: Dyspnea was the most common presenting symptom of PAP and 90% of patients report progression over time. The majority of aPAP patients receiving WLL required this on a recurrent basis, and the frequency was highly variable among individuals. Further studies are needed to better define the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapies of aPAP.
Home Home Home Inbox Home Search